Optimal concentrations in nectar feeding
WebThe model predicts that optimal sugar concentrations vary for particular pollinators as a function of two primary factors: (1) the energy flux derived from the nectar, as discussed above, as well as (2) the relative contribution of transit costs to overall foraging costs. ... Daniel TL (1983) Mechanical determinants of nectar feeding strategy ... WebJan 22, 2024 · For bumblebees and honeybees, which feed on nectar by lapping, dipping their feathery glossa (tongue) into the nectar [ 9, 15, 16 ], models of drinking rates predict …
Optimal concentrations in nectar feeding
Did you know?
WebOptimal sugar concentrations of floral nectars -dependence on sugar intake efficiency and foraging costs Oecologia. 1983 Nov;60 (2):198-213. doi: 10.1007/BF00379522. Author Amy J Heyneman 1 Affiliation 1 Department of Zoology, University of California, 90027, Berkeley, CA, USA. PMID: 28310487 DOI: 10.1007/BF00379522 Abstract WebSep 24, 2024 · Optimal concentrations for nectar drinking are limited by the steep increase in the viscosity of sugar solutions with concentration. However, nectar viscosity is inversely related to temperature, which suggests there are advantages to foraging from flowers that are warmer than the surrounding air.
WebDec 7, 2024 · The range of theoretically optimal concentrations found rationalizes the nectar concentration (35%) of flowers pollinated by honey bees in nature, providing a possible mechanistic explanation for the bees' preferred nectar concentration. ... Kim W, Gilet T and Bush J W 2011 Optimal concentrations in nectar feeding Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 108 ...
WebKim W, Gilet T, Bush JW (2011) Optimal concentrations in nectar feeding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:16618–16621. 2. Rico-Guevara A, Rubega MA (2012) Hummingbird feeding mechanics: Comments on the capillarity model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:E867. 3. Rico-Guevara A, Rubega MA (2011) The hummingbird tongue is a fluid trap, not WebSummary. A model is developed to elucidate the determinants of sugar concentrations in flower nectars. This model analyses the efficiency of sugar intake, or energy flux, which …
WebJun 6, 2013 · Optimization of sugar flow and transport efficiency predicts optimal concentrations of 23.5 per cent (if the pressure differential driving the flow is independent of concentration) and 34.5 per cent (if the pressure is proportional to concentration).
WebSeasonal intake responses could reflect digestive plasticity in the nectar-feeding bat Anoura geoffroyi 12 October 2024 Jorge Ayala-Berdon, Cesar García Corona & Margarita Martínez … normal price for scooterWebMar 20, 2011 · We identify three nectar drinking techniques: active suction, capillary suction, and viscous dipping. For each, we deduce the dependence of the volume intake rate on … normal price for frenchieWebOptimal concentrations in nectar feeding Kim, Wonjung; Gilet, Tristan ; Bush, John W.M. 2011 • In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of … how to remove scratches from belt bucklesWebSep 26, 2011 · A relatively complete physical picture of the fluid dynamics of nectar feeding has emerged. First and foremost, the optimal nectar concentration for a given creature … how to remove scratches from a windscreenWebWe identify three nectar drinking techniques: active suction, capillary suction, and viscous dipping. For each, we deduce the dependence of the volume intake rate on the nectar … normal price to earnings ratioWebMar 1, 2015 · From the formula of nectar intake mass listed above, we can speculate that if all of the hairs erect vertically, namely α ( x )=90°, the proboscis will ideally lift the largest amount of nectar, which can be calculated as . However, the average erection angle was 37.26°, which was not in accordance with the optimal erection angles. how to remove scratches from cameraWebof nectar trapping, as opposed to capillarity, while feeding (cf. 2, 5). Hence, the outputs of their model and conclusions with regard to optimal concentrations in nectar feeding may be broadly unrealistic. Alejandro Rico-Guevara1 and Margaret A. Rubega Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 1. normal printed photo size